Obama’s Scorecard in Russia
So the Obamas headed to Moscow this week, and now on their way to another European summit, with supposed grandiose objectives. On their return trip, I don’t think they can really claim much in real achievement.
I guess, at the very least, Putin didn’t tear Obama apart ala Khruschev and John F. Kennedy…that is something.
In all fairness, nothing was going to come of this. Putin (and his puppet Medvedev) weren’t going to give Obama anything that they hadn’t already decided to give George W. Bush. They agreed on further nuclear arsenal reductions, but they are basically at similar levels that Bush and Putin came close to agreeing on in the previous administration. On all other major issues (North Korea, Iran, missile defense, NATO expansion) they really maintained the status quo. I guess we should be happy that at least Obama didn’t barter away SDI for some minimal Russian concession.
Obama did say all the right things in Moscow. Well, at least for the Russian audience. Obama somehow blundered the easiest question of all. Asked by Major Garrett of Fox News whether America won the Cold War, Obama just make himself admit the reality. Can you imagine, an American President unable to say the simple fact that we won the Cold War?
Obama responded:
Well, listen, the — I think that you just cut out Lech Walesa and the Poles. You just cut out Havel and the Czechs. There were a whole bunch of people throughout Eastern Europe who showed enormous courage.
And I think that it is very important in this part of the world to acknowledge the degree to which people struggled for their own freedom. I’m very proud of the traditions of Democratic and Republican presidents to lift the Iron Curtain.
But, you know, we don’t have to diminish other people in order to recognize our role in that history.
This, of course, ignores the opinion of those leaders that Obama points out, most specifically Lech Walesa. From Powerline:
Walesa himself has a somewhat different perspective. In his comments on the death of Ronald Reagan, Walesa wrote: “When talking about Ronald Reagan, I have to be personal. We in Poland took him so personally. Why? Because we owe him our liberty. This can’t be said often enough by people who lived under oppression for half a century, until communism fell in 1989.”
The video of the quote is below. For him, stating any reality like winning and losing ‘diminishes others’. This guy must have played team sports as a kid without keeping score. Hilarious.
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBo1scLwrH4
There were two major failures of the summit. First, not getting Russia to budge, even a little, on dealing with rogue states in the United Nations. Don’t expect any movement from the Russian side on Iran or North Korea, which means that we are on our own; which in turn means, that with Obama leading the way, don’t expect anything substantiative to happen.
The second failure was in Putin resisting more openess on business and freedom of speech, as well as human rights. Obama first of all walked a tightrope on this. Remember, Obama’s major diplomatic talent is to avoid insulting the other side, even if it means avoiding reality. Russia continues down a road, both politically and economially, that is detrimental for Russia and the wider world. Russian closed-mindedness has helped destroy the Russian economy, and an unstable Russia is not good for anyone.
In fact, there probably was little Obama could do to convince Putin to make any radical changes. He likes things the way they are; with him in charge, basically for life. And Russians are still delusional about their world status. Other than their nuclear arsenal and their United Nations Security Council seat, one could argue that they have less economic clout than India or Brazil, and maybe less political clout as well. They act like a superpower, with little to back it up. There entire economy is built upon quicksand…the oil market. And no surprise, the United States is even undermining that, by building their own pipeline from the Caucuses through Turkey, in order to minimize the monopoly that Russia holds over the oil market in Europe. Smart move by Obama to only announce that after the Russian summit.
But this again goes to show that Obama’s famed ability to talk to foreign leaders has been vastly overblown. This is just another summit, after the G20, the OAS, and the NATO summit, where Obama has failed to get anything more done than his predecessor.







I wonder why you think it’s a bad thing for Obama to be diplomatic and not piss anyone outside of America off by saying that we won the Cold War? The Cold War was not a real war, technically. When one wins a real war, that is through the destruction or surrender of the other side. The Cold War doesn’t have such black and white terms. Obama refuses to deal with things black and white. He may be the President of the United States of America, but unlike his predecessor, he does not think other countries are beneath him. He is fair and open-minded, something you seem to lack in your incessant need for a conservative, medieval nationalist attitude of “America is Best! Freedom! YEAH!”
Because truth is truth. If you don’t speak truth to your friends (or enemies), than what are you basing any talks on?
We won the Cold War. How can I tell? Can you point me to the Soviet Union? We won, they lost. Putin, for all of his totalitarianism, is not a communist. That proves we won. Speaking truth to Russia does not make them beneath us…in fact, it treats them as equals.
Obama has a terrible tendency to ignore facts, to make people feel better. Feeling good is great, but accomplishes nothing if you ignore reality.
Obama is a FAILURE. He is nothing more then a puppet..he wants to do as his masters want..like a good little boy, first we destroy the economy then make deal with some really shitty people.
Words mean things. The truth is far more important than feelings. As to the first comment: this looks like the poisoned mind as a courtesy of our new way of educating people in the country. You are free to believe what you please. I find it ironic that you have no real argument and deal yourself in terms of ‘Black and White’. How do you know that the former president thought other countries were beneath him? I vividly recall former President Bush saying freedom was a right for all people. So what is beneath freedom? Liberalism is nice concept that truly suffers from the lack of intellecutal rigor in favor of emotionalism.
Um, I never said Bush thought other countries were beneath him…it is a liberal charge that is made on several occasions. I was paraphrasing them.
First comment meaning Joe. Not you Avatara.